ABLV vs VTRS
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 24, 2026
ABLV
45.8
AI Score
VS
VTRS Wins
VTRS
65.8
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
VTRS
66score
Recommendation
BUY
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ABLV | VTRS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 105.20M | 14.30B | VTRS |
| Net Income | 820,018 | -3.51B | ABLV |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 35.1% | VTRS |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -24.6% | ABLV |
| Operating Income | -486,613 | -2.66B | ABLV |
| ROE | 10.6% | -23.9% | ABLV |
| ROA | 2.4% | -9.5% | ABLV |
| Total Assets | 34.55M | 37.19B | VTRS |
| Cash | 9.01M | 1.32B | VTRS |
| Debt/Equity | 0.28 | 0.85 | ABLV |
| Current Ratio | 1.62 | 1.38 | ABLV |
| Free Cash Flow | 1.17M | 1.94B | VTRS |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
ABLV 1M: -9.7%
· 3M: -17.6%
VTRS 1M: -5.6%
· 3M: -0.9%
Current Technical Phase
ABLV
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 49
VTRS
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 44
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | ABLV | VTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.0 | 6.1 |
| Trailing P/E | — | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| EPS | -0.05 | -0.37 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, VTRS is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 5 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.