CTS vs SANM
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 03, 2026
CTS
SANM
Investment Advisor Scores
SANM
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CTS | SANM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 25.3165 | 18.315 | SANM |
| PEG Ratio | 1.5826 | 0.9154 | SANM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 7.0% | 69.7% | SANM |
| Earnings Growth | 6.5% | 68.3% | SANM |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 56.5/100 | 50.1/100 | CTS |
| Profit Margin | 12.4% | 2.4% | CTS |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
CTS
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (1.8% over 20 days), RSI 58
SANM
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -3.8%), weak momentum, RSI 41
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | CTS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 21.5 | 12.3 |
| Trailing P/E | 25.8 | 44.2 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.7% |
| Gross Margin | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 2.43 | 3.90 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |