NUS vs COTY
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 30, 2026
NUS
COTY
Investment Advisor Scores
COTY
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | NUS | COTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 3.9746 | 7.8802 | NUS |
| PEG Ratio | 0.7782 | 0.1783 | COTY |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -17.1% | 1.3% | COTY |
| Earnings Growth | -98.2% | -22.2% | COTY |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 52.6/100 | 59.6/100 | COTY |
| Profit Margin | -15.7% | -10.4% | COTY |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
NUS
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -3.8%), weak momentum, RSI 42
COTY
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 49
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | NUS | COTY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 3.9 | 7.7 |
| Trailing P/E | — | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | -0.2% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| EPS | -4.47 | -0.70 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | — |