BLFS vs LMAT
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 28, 2026
BLFS
LMAT
Investment Advisor Scores
LMAT
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 238.0952 | 25.5754 | LMAT |
| PEG Ratio | 65.3833 | 2.131 | LMAT |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 21.5% | 9.6% | BLFS |
| Earnings Growth | -13.9% | 22.6% | LMAT |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 45.0/100 | 55.1/100 | LMAT |
| Profit Margin | 54.4% | 25.0% | BLFS |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | STRONG BUY | LMAT |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
BLFS
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (10.2% over 20 days), RSI 56
LMAT
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -8.5%), weak momentum, RSI 40
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | BLFS | LMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 111.5 | 25.2 |
| Trailing P/E | 38.9 | 28.9 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 1.00 | 2.86 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.01% |