FULT vs UMBF
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 11, 2026
FULT
UMBF
Investment Advisor Scores
UMBF
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FULT | UMBF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 10.1523 | 10.2145 | FULT |
| PEG Ratio | 1.5402 | 2.5387 | FULT |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 13.7% | 12.2% | FULT |
| Earnings Growth | -1.9% | 26.2% | UMBF |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 60.4/100 | 61.0/100 | UMBF |
| Profit Margin | 29.7% | 33.5% | UMBF |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | BUY | HOLD | FULT |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
FULT
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 46
UMBF
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 40
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | FULT | UMBF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Trailing P/E | 11.3 | 11.8 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| EPS | 2.08 | 11.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.01% |