ATS vs EPAC
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 14, 2026
ATS
EPAC
Investment Advisor Scores
EPAC
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | ATS | EPAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 17.0068 | 17.5747 | ATS |
| PEG Ratio | 0 | 0.3442 | Tie |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -5.8% | 5.6% | EPAC |
| Earnings Growth | 358.0% | 42.2% | ATS |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 50.6/100 | 44.6/100 | ATS |
| Profit Margin | 1.6% | 14.7% | EPAC |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
ATS
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -11.0%), weak momentum, RSI 31
EPAC
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (3.3% over 20 days), RSI 57
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | ATS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.9 | 18.1 |
| Trailing P/E | 56.7 | 20.9 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| EPS | 0.34 | 1.77 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |