CFG vs FITB
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 22, 2026
CFG
FITB
Investment Advisor Scores
FITB
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CFG | FITB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 13.4409 | 13.369 | FITB |
| PEG Ratio | 1.6472 | 2.0894 | CFG |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 14.7% | 51.8% | FITB |
| Earnings Growth | 41.3% | -5.7% | CFG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 47.7/100 | 50.7/100 | FITB |
| Profit Margin | 26.1% | 23.2% | CFG |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
CFG
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 40
FITB
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 37
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | CFG | FITB |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.7 | 11.2 |
| Trailing P/E | 15.4 | 18.5 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 4.52 | 2.94 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |