COST vs CSGP
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jul 31, 2026
COST
CSGP
Investment Advisor Scores
CSGP
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | COST | CSGP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 42.735 | 19.8807 | CSGP |
| PEG Ratio | 4.6895 | 0.1193 | CSGP |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 21.5% | 22.5% | CSGP |
| Earnings Growth | 45.5% | -25.9% | COST |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 50.4/100 | 52.6/100 | CSGP |
| Profit Margin | 3.0% | 0.7% | COST |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
COST
DistributionPrice near a flattening SMA50 (slope -3.5%) with fading momentum, RSI 49
CSGP
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 54
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | COST | CSGP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 41.8 | 17.5 |
| Trailing P/E | 47.4 | 164.3 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 0.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 20.03 | 0.18 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | — |