COST vs GILD

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2026

COST

65.1
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

GILD

35.4
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

65score
Recommendation
HOLD

GILD

35score
Recommendation
AVOID NEW MONEY

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST GILD Winner
Forward P/E 40.3226 15.5521 GILD
PEG Ratio 4.4343 2.2696 GILD
Revenue Growth 11.1% 10.2% COST
Earnings Growth 15.0% 54.8% GILD
Tradestie Score 65.1/100 35.4/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% -10.6% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD AVOID NEW MONEY COST

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.5% · 3M: +3.2% GILD 1M: +0.1% · 3M: +8.9%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 61

RSI (14): 61.0 · Price: $942.25

GILD

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 50

RSI (14): 49.8 · Price: $146.85

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST GILD
Market Cap — —
Forward P/E 41.6 14.9
Trailing P/E 44.5 —
Revenue (TTM) — —
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.8%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.3%
EPS 21.03 -2.65
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.