COST vs GILD

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2026

COST

52.4
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

GILD

44.1
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

52score
Recommendation
BUY

GILD

44score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST GILD Winner
Forward P/E 42.0168 15.2207 GILD
PEG Ratio 4.6224 2.1441 GILD
Revenue Growth 21.5% 10.2% COST
Earnings Growth 45.5% 54.8% GILD
Tradestie Score 52.4/100 44.1/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% -10.6% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation BUY HOLD COST

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +1.6% · 3M: -7.7% GILD 1M: +1.5% · 3M: +4.8%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 56

RSI (14): 55.6 · Price: $961.10

GILD

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 62

RSI (14): 62.0 · Price: $138.36

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST GILD
Market Cap
Forward P/E 42.3 14.0
Trailing P/E 47.9
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.8%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.3%
EPS 20.10 -2.69
Dividend Yield 0.01% 0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.