EPAC vs TTWO
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 13, 2026
EPAC
TTWO
Investment Advisor Scores
TTWO
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | EPAC | TTWO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 17.331 | 28.9017 | EPAC |
| PEG Ratio | 0.3442 | 2.8923 | EPAC |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 5.6% | 2.0% | EPAC |
| Earnings Growth | 42.2% | -49.7% | EPAC |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 45.1/100 | 58.4/100 | TTWO |
| Profit Margin | 14.7% | -4.8% | EPAC |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | BUY | TTWO |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
EPAC
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 38
TTWO
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -0.1%), weak momentum, RSI 36
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | EPAC | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.1 | 57.2 |
| Trailing P/E | 20.7 | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| EPS | 1.71 | -1.78 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |