FANG vs ILMN
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Nov 01, 2026
FANG
ILMN
Investment Advisor Scores
ILMN
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FANG | ILMN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 9.5694 | 46.9484 | FANG |
| PEG Ratio | 10.073 | 3.5632 | ILMN |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 52.5% | 9.4% | FANG |
| Earnings Growth | 179.5% | -9.4% | FANG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 50.4/100 | 51.7/100 | ILMN |
| Profit Margin | 9.0% | 18.3% | ILMN |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
FANG
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 67
ILMN
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 39
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | FANG | ILMN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.1 | 38.5 |
| Trailing P/E | 39.3 | 54.1 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| EPS | 5.25 | 5.36 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | — |