FISV vs CTAS
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 15, 2026
FISV
CTAS
Investment Advisor Scores
CTAS
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FISV | CTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 7.2307 | 37.1747 | FISV |
| PEG Ratio | 1.3032 | 3.2158 | FISV |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 8.9% | CTAS |
| Earnings Growth | 0.0% | 15.6% | CTAS |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 49.1/100 | 46.1/100 | FISV |
| Profit Margin | 0.0% | 17.8% | CTAS |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | BUY | HOLD | FISV |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
FISV
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 50
CTAS
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (7.0% over 20 days), RSI 57
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | FISV | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 6.4 | 37.6 |
| Trailing P/E | 10.0 | 41.3 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | — | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| EPS | 0.00 | 4.93 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.01% |