GILD vs QCOM
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 02, 2026
GILD
QCOM
Investment Advisor Scores
QCOM
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GILD | QCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 15.2207 | 13.8122 | QCOM |
| PEG Ratio | 2.1441 | 0.4916 | QCOM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 4.4% | -3.5% | GILD |
| Earnings Growth | 54.8% | 173.0% | QCOM |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 53.5/100 | 50.2/100 | GILD |
| Profit Margin | 31.0% | 22.3% | GILD |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
GILD
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 54
QCOM
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | GILD | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.5 | 16.3 |
| Trailing P/E | — | 18.4 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.8% | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| EPS | -2.63 | 8.74 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.02% |