MGIC vs PENG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 29, 2026
MGIC
PENG
Investment Advisor Scores
PENG
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MGIC | PENG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 23.9234 | 12.4844 | PENG |
| PEG Ratio | 1.08 | 0 | Tie |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 13.1% | 47.6% | PENG |
| Earnings Growth | 17.6% | 544.4% | PENG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 55.0/100 | 35.6/100 | MGIC |
| Profit Margin | 6.6% | 6.5% | MGIC |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | AVOID NEW MONEY | MGIC |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
MGIC
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.3%), weak momentum, RSI 31
PENG
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 64
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | MGIC | PENG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 15.4 | 18.4 |
| Trailing P/E | 23.7 | 39.3 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 0.82 | 1.40 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | — |