MTB vs CFG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jul 28, 2026
MTB
56.9
AI Score
VS
CFG Wins
CFG
57.6
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
CFG
58score
Recommendation
HOLD
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MTB | CFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2.17B | 418.00M | CFG |
| Net Income | 517.00M | 664.00M | MTB |
| Net Margin | 23.8% | 158.9% | MTB |
| ROE | 2.0% | 2.4% | MTB |
| ROA | 0.2% | 0.3% | MTB |
| Total Assets | 227.92B | 214.74B | CFG |
| Debt/Equity | 0.47 | 0.40 | MTB |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
MTB 1M: +4.4%
· 3M: +15.3%
CFG 1M: +2.4%
· 3M: +12.9%
Current Technical Phase
MTB
MarkupHold / add on dips
Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (6.2% over 20 days), RSI 58
CFG
MarkupHold / add on dips
Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (5.0% over 20 days), RSI 58
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | MTB | CFG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.9 | 11.2 |
| Trailing P/E | 13.0 | 15.6 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 18.89 | 4.59 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, CFG is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 2 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.