MTB vs CFG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 23, 2026
MTB
CFG
Investment Advisor Scores
CFG
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MTB | CFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 10.8108 | 10.3093 | CFG |
| PEG Ratio | 1.3864 | 1.6472 | MTB |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 6.2% | 14.7% | CFG |
| Earnings Growth | 25.5% | 41.3% | CFG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 57.9/100 | 65.8/100 | CFG |
| Profit Margin | 32.1% | 26.1% | MTB |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
MTB
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.5%), weak momentum, RSI 31
CFG
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.3%), weak momentum, RSI 34
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | MTB | CFG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.4 | 9.9 |
| Trailing P/E | 11.5 | 13.9 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 18.87 | 4.59 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |