MTB vs CFG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Nov 12, 2026
MTB
CFG
Investment Advisor Scores
CFG
Nov 12, 2026AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MTB | CFG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 10.4493 | 9.9206 | CFG |
| PEG Ratio | 1.3063 | 1.6472 | MTB |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 0.5% | 11.9% | CFG |
| Earnings Growth | 4.6% | 34.3% | CFG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 43.7/100 | 46.3/100 | CFG |
| Profit Margin | 31.9% | 27.0% | MTB |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
| Implied Volatility | N/A | N/A | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
MTB
DistributionPrice near a flattening SMA50 (slope -4.1%) with fading momentum, RSI 47
CFG
DistributionPrice near a flattening SMA50 (slope -4.0%) with fading momentum, RSI 50
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | MTB | CFG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.4 | 10.0 |
| Trailing P/E | 11.5 | 13.2 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 19.14 | 4.95 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |