NTAP vs CYBR
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 23, 2026
NTAP
CYBR
Investment Advisor Scores
CYBR
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | NTAP | CYBR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 21.8818 | 83.3333 | NTAP |
| PEG Ratio | 2.1876 | 4.7433 | NTAP |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 12.5% | 18.5% | CYBR |
| Earnings Growth | 23.4% | 76.0% | CYBR |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 49.3/100 | 54.8/100 | CYBR |
| Profit Margin | 18.4% | -10.8% | NTAP |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | BUY | CYBR |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
NTAP
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (10.9% over 20 days), RSI 57
CYBR
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -4.7%), weak momentum, RSI 39
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | NTAP | CYBR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 22.5 | 62.9 |
| Trailing P/E | 30.6 | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | -0.1% |
| EPS | 6.30 | -2.95 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | — |