UMBF vs BSAC
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026
UMBF
BSAC
Investment Advisor Scores
BSAC
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | UMBF | BSAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 11.8343 | 15.7729 | UMBF |
| PEG Ratio | 2.5387 | 2.5026 | BSAC |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 49.0% | 19.3% | UMBF |
| Earnings Growth | 176.9% | 40.0% | UMBF |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 56.1/100 | 50.8/100 | UMBF |
| Profit Margin | 32.3% | 47.3% | BSAC |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
UMBF
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (5.1% over 20 days), RSI 57
BSAC
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (3.0% over 20 days), RSI 59
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | UMBF | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.5 | 11.3 |
| Trailing P/E | 12.3 | 13.5 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| EPS | 11.80 | 2.60 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.04% |