AFL vs UNM
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 23, 2026
AFL
UNM
Investment Advisor Scores
UNM
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | AFL | UNM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 14.5349 | 8.2169 | UNM |
| PEG Ratio | 1.1813 | 1.0285 | UNM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -1.0% | 0.3% | UNM |
| Earnings Growth | 46.8% | -16.2% | AFL |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 51.0/100 | 52.6/100 | UNM |
| Profit Margin | 26.9% | 5.3% | AFL |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
AFL
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 31
UNM
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 46
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | AFL | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 15.4 | 9.3 |
| Trailing P/E | 12.5 | 20.2 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 9.27 | 4.31 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.02% |