AZN vs COST
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Oct 05, 2026
AZN
47.2
AI Score
VS
COST Wins
COST
47.5
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
COST
48score
Recommendation
HOLD
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | AZN | COST | Winner |
|---|
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
AZN 1M: -2.9%
· 3M: -17.5%
COST 1M: -0.8%
· 3M: -3.1%
Current Technical Phase
AZN
MarkdownSell / avoid
Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -3.7%), weak momentum, RSI 38
COST
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 51
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | AZN | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.6 | 40.6 |
| Trailing P/E | 23.6 | 43.9 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.8% | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| EPS | 6.68 | 20.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.