CFG vs MTB
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Oct 25, 2026
CFG
69.6
AI Score
VS
CFG Wins
MTB
65.0
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CFG | MTB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4.45B | 860.00M | CFG |
| Net Income | 1.10B | 1.48B | MTB |
| Net Margin | 24.8% | 172.3% | MTB |
| ROE | 4.2% | 5.3% | MTB |
| ROA | 0.5% | 0.7% | MTB |
| Total Assets | 233.84B | 219.26B | CFG |
| Debt/Equity | 0.58 | 0.49 | MTB |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
CFG 1M: +0.6%
· 3M: -8.4%
MTB 1M: +1.4%
· 3M: -10.7%
Current Technical Phase
CFG
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 50
MTB
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 50
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | CFG | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.0 | 10.5 |
| Trailing P/E | 14.2 | 11.8 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 4.59 | 18.92 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, CFG is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 2 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.