CFG vs MTB

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2026

CFG

47.7
AI Score
VS
CFG Wins

MTB

44.5
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

CFG

48score
Recommendation
HOLD

MTB

45score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric CFG MTB Winner
Forward P/E 13.4409 12.8041 MTB
PEG Ratio 1.6472 1.6415 MTB
Revenue Growth 14.7% 6.2% CFG
Earnings Growth 41.3% 25.5% CFG
Tradestie Score 47.7/100 44.5/100 CFG
Profit Margin 26.1% 32.1% MTB
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

CFG 1M: -2.7% · 3M: +11.3% MTB 1M: -2.3% · 3M: +13.2%

Current Technical Phase

CFG

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 40

RSI (14): 40.3 · Price: $69.86

MTB

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 40

RSI (14): 40.0 · Price: $240.34

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric CFG MTB
Market Cap
Forward P/E 10.7 11.4
Trailing P/E 15.4 13.0
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.1%
Gross Margin 1.0% 1.0%
Operating Margin 0.4% 0.5%
EPS 4.52 18.39
Dividend Yield 0.03% 0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, CFG is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.