COST vs ILMN

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2026

COST

47.1
AI Score
VS
ILMN Wins

ILMN

56.8
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

47score
Recommendation
HOLD

ILMN

57score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

AI insights temporarily unavailable

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST ILMN Winner
Revenue 207.43B 1.09B COST
Net Income 6.23B 134.00M COST
Net Margin 3.0% 12.3% ILMN
Operating Income 7.88B 209.00M COST
ROE 18.6% 5.0% COST
ROA 7.2% 2.0% COST
Total Assets 86.43B 6.56B COST
Current Ratio 1.07 1.75 ILMN
Free Cash Flow 6.91B 251.00M COST

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.6% · 3M: -6.5% ILMN 1M: -2.9% · 3M: +35.6%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -3.5%) with fading momentum, RSI 49

RSI (14): 49.2 · Price: $946.28

ILMN

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48

RSI (14): 48.2 · Price: $188.10

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST ILMN
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.8 31.0
Trailing P/E 47.4 37.3
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.7%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.2%
EPS 20.03 5.19
Dividend Yield 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, ILMN is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 2 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.