COST vs ISRG

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 01, 2026

COST

47.9
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

ISRG

46.6
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

48score
Recommendation
HOLD

ISRG

47score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST ISRG Winner
Forward P/E 42.9185 32.7869 ISRG
PEG Ratio 4.7257 1.7323 ISRG
Revenue Growth 21.5% 18.5% COST
Earnings Growth 45.5% 26.5% COST
Tradestie Score 47.9/100 46.6/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 28.4% ISRG
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.6% · 3M: -6.5% ISRG 1M: -8.2% · 3M: -16.7%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -3.5%) with fading momentum, RSI 49

RSI (14): 49.2 · Price: $946.28

ISRG

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 51

RSI (14): 50.9 · Price: $377.93

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST ISRG
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.8 31.4
Trailing P/E 47.4 43.1
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 0.2%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.7%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.3%
EPS 20.03 8.67
Dividend Yield 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.