COST vs MSFT

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2026

COST

55.6
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

MSFT

49.5
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

56score
Recommendation
HOLD

MSFT

50score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

AI insights temporarily unavailable

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST MSFT Winner
Revenue 207.43B 241.83B MSFT
Net Income 6.23B 97.98B MSFT
Net Margin 3.0% 40.5% MSFT
Operating Income 7.88B 114.63B MSFT
ROE 18.6% 23.6% MSFT
ROA 7.2% 14.1% MSFT
Total Assets 86.43B 694.23B MSFT
Cash 18.95B 32.10B MSFT
Debt/Equity 0.17 0.10 MSFT
Current Ratio 1.07 1.28 MSFT
Free Cash Flow 6.91B 47.35B MSFT

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.5% · 3M: +3.2% MSFT 1M: +7.2% · 3M: +37.8%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 61

RSI (14): 61.0 · Price: $942.25

MSFT

Markup
Hold / add on dips

Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (10.5% over 20 days), RSI 68

RSI (14): 68.4 · Price: $529.76

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST MSFT
Market Cap — —
Forward P/E 41.6 27.3
Trailing P/E 44.5 29.3
Revenue (TTM) — —
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.2%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.7%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.5%
EPS 21.03 18.09
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.