COST vs MU

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2026

COST

68.2
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

MU

42.8
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

68score
Recommendation
HOLD

MU

43score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST MU Winner
Forward P/E 40.3226 7.0175 MU
PEG Ratio 4.4343 0.1598 MU
Revenue Growth 11.1% 345.7% MU
Earnings Growth 15.0% 1368.5% MU
Tradestie Score 68.2/100 42.8/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 55.9% MU
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.5% · 3M: +3.2% MU 1M: +8.8% · 3M: +9.7%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 61

RSI (14): 61.0 · Price: $942.25

MU

Markup
Hold / add on dips

Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (3.6% over 20 days), RSI 59

RSI (14): 59.3 · Price: $1088.00

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST MU
Market Cap — —
Forward P/E 41.6 5.3
Trailing P/E 44.5 14.1
Revenue (TTM) — —
Revenue Growth 0.1% 3.8%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.8%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.8%
EPS 21.03 74.33
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.