COST vs MU

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026

COST

62.1
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

MU

50.8
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

62score
Recommendation
BUY

MU

51score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST MU Winner
Forward P/E 41.4938 5.8343 MU
PEG Ratio 4.5648 0.1329 MU
Revenue Growth 21.5% 345.7% MU
Earnings Growth 45.5% 1368.5% MU
Tradestie Score 62.1/100 50.8/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 55.9% MU
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation BUY HOLD COST

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.8% · 3M: -6.3% MU 1M: -11.5% · 3M: +35.7%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -3.5%) with fading momentum, RSI 50

RSI (14): 49.9 · Price: $947.82

MU

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48

RSI (14): 47.8 · Price: $877.57

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST MU
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.8 5.7
Trailing P/E 47.4 18.7
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 3.5%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.7%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.8%
EPS 20.03 44.28
Dividend Yield 0.01% 0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.