COST vs TTWO
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 13, 2026
COST
38.0
AI Score
VS
TTWO Wins
TTWO
58.4
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
TTWO
58score
Recommendation
HOLD
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | COST | TTWO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 207.43B | 1.53B | COST |
| Net Income | 6.23B | -34.10M | COST |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | -2.2% | COST |
| Operating Income | 7.88B | -35.50M | COST |
| ROE | 18.6% | -0.9% | COST |
| ROA | 7.2% | -0.4% | COST |
| Total Assets | 86.43B | 9.06B | COST |
| Cash | 18.95B | 1.36B | COST |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17 | 0.52 | COST |
| Current Ratio | 1.07 | 1.06 | COST |
| Free Cash Flow | 6.91B | -193.80M | COST |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
COST 1M: +3.5%
· 3M: +3.2%
TTWO 1M: -4.4%
· 3M: -17.1%
Current Technical Phase
COST
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 61
TTWO
MarkdownSell / avoid
Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -6.1%), weak momentum, RSI 40
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | COST | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 41.6 | 54.2 |
| Trailing P/E | 44.5 | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| EPS | 21.03 | -1.73 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, TTWO is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.