COST vs WBD

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2026

COST

52.4
AI Score
VS
WBD Wins

WBD

56.3
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

52score
Recommendation
HOLD

WBD

56score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST WBD Winner
Forward P/E 42.0168 2500 COST
PEG Ratio 4.6167 216.9231 COST
Revenue Growth 21.5% -1.0% COST
Earnings Growth 45.5% 226.7% WBD
Tradestie Score 52.4/100 56.3/100 WBD
Profit Margin 3.0% -4.7% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.6% · 3M: -6.5% WBD 1M: +0.4% · 3M: -1.4%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -3.5%) with fading momentum, RSI 49

RSI (14): 49.2 · Price: $946.28

WBD

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 56

RSI (14): 56.3 · Price: $26.74

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST WBD
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.8 -518.0
Trailing P/E 47.4
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 0.0%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.5%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.1%
EPS 20.03 -0.71
Dividend Yield 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, WBD is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.