COST vs WBD

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 01, 2026

COST

51.2
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

WBD

44.8
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

51score
Recommendation
HOLD

WBD

45score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST WBD Winner
Forward P/E 41.3223 2500 COST
PEG Ratio 4.5347 216.9231 COST
Revenue Growth 21.5% -11.2% COST
Earnings Growth 45.5% -90.6% COST
Tradestie Score 51.2/100 44.8/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% -8.8% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: -0.8% · 3M: -0.2% WBD 1M: +8.5% · 3M: +4.7%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -1.2%) with fading momentum, RSI 47

RSI (14): 47.4 · Price: $943.89

WBD

Markup
Hold / add on dips

Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (1.5% over 20 days), RSI 63

RSI (14): 62.9 · Price: $28.53

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST WBD
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.6 -3205.6
Trailing P/E 46.9
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% -0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.5%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.1%
EPS 20.14 -1.28
Dividend Yield 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.