COST vs WBD

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 21, 2026

COST

61.0
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

WBD

51.1
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

61score
Recommendation
HOLD

WBD

51score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST WBD Winner
Forward P/E 39.8406 344.8276 COST
PEG Ratio 4.3806 55.1758 COST
Revenue Growth 11.6% -11.2% COST
Earnings Growth 15.2% -90.6% COST
Tradestie Score 61.0/100 51.1/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% -8.8% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: -6.4% · 3M: -5.9% WBD 1M: -2.6% · 3M: +6.1%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Markdown
Sell / avoid

Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -1.3%), weak momentum, RSI 36

RSI (14): 35.9 · Price: $895.31

WBD

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 47

RSI (14): 46.6 · Price: $27.80

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST WBD
Market Cap
Forward P/E 39.5 -3123.6
Trailing P/E 45.0
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.1% -0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.5%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.1%
EPS 19.85 -1.28
Dividend Yield 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.