CTAS vs GILD
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Oct 07, 2026
CTAS
GILD
Investment Advisor Scores
GILD
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CTAS | GILD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 36.2319 | 15.5521 | GILD |
| PEG Ratio | 3.1404 | 2.2696 | GILD |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 10.9% | 10.2% | CTAS |
| Earnings Growth | 13.3% | 54.8% | GILD |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 57.8/100 | 56.0/100 | CTAS |
| Profit Margin | 17.8% | -10.6% | CTAS |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | STRONG BUY | HOLD | CTAS |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
CTAS
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 49
GILD
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 50
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | CTAS | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 36.4 | 14.9 |
| Trailing P/E | 38.7 | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 5.07 | -2.65 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.02% |