GTX vs AAP
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 09, 2026
GTX
65.0
AI Score
VS
AAP Wins
AAP
71.2
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GTX | AAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 826.00M | 4.61B | AAP |
| Net Income | 52.00M | 80.00M | AAP |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 45.6% | AAP |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 1.7% | GTX |
| ROE | -6.7% | 3.5% | AAP |
| ROA | 2.4% | 0.7% | GTX |
| Total Assets | 2.15B | 12.02B | AAP |
| Cash | 96.00M | 3.12B | AAP |
| Debt/Equity | -1.88 | 1.50 | GTX |
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | AAP |
| Free Cash Flow | 208.00M | 120.00M | GTX |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
GTX 1M: -5.9%
· 3M: -17.3%
AAP 1M: -16.5%
· 3M: -26.3%
Current Technical Phase
GTX
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 46
AAP
MarkdownSell / avoid
Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -9.3%), weak momentum, RSI 42
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | GTX | AAP |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.0 | 11.5 |
| Trailing P/E | 15.1 | 24.2 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 1.80 | 1.79 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, AAP is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 7 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.