GTX vs LKQ
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2026
GTX
LKQ
Investment Advisor Scores
LKQ
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | GTX | LKQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 12.5945 | 8.0645 | LKQ |
| PEG Ratio | 0 | 1.0576 | Tie |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 6.9% | -3.0% | GTX |
| Earnings Growth | 26.2% | -29.0% | GTX |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 63.3/100 | 33.7/100 | GTX |
| Profit Margin | 9.5% | 3.4% | GTX |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | SELL | GTX |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
GTX
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 46
LKQ
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -1.1%), weak momentum, RSI 42
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | GTX | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.0 | 7.8 |
| Trailing P/E | 15.1 | 13.4 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 1.80 | 1.76 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.05% |