MS vs WFC

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2026

MS

53.4
AI Score
VS
MS Wins

WFC

52.4
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

MS

53score
Recommendation
HOLD

WFC

52score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric MS WFC Winner
Forward P/E 17.2414 12.0192 WFC
PEG Ratio 2.0301 1.6243 WFC
Revenue Growth 28.0% 9.5% MS
Earnings Growth 62.4% 25.0% MS
Tradestie Score 53.4/100 52.4/100 MS
Profit Margin 25.9% 27.2% WFC
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

MS 1M: -0.5% · 3M: +6.8% WFC 1M: -2.7% · 3M: +10.4%

Current Technical Phase

MS

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 49

RSI (14): 49.1 · Price: $214.20

WFC

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 40

RSI (14): 39.9 · Price: $83.84

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric MS WFC
Market Cap
Forward P/E 15.7 10.5
Trailing P/E 16.8 12.5
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.3% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.9% 1.0%
Operating Margin 0.4% 0.4%
EPS 12.38 6.70
Dividend Yield 0.02% 0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, MS is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.