MU vs VRSK

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 01, 2026

MU

54.6
AI Score
VS
MU Wins

VRSK

52.9
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

MU

55score
Recommendation
HOLD

VRSK

53score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

AI insights temporarily unavailable

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric MU VRSK Winner
Revenue 78.96B 782.60M MU
Net Income 47.27B 234.20M MU
Net Margin 59.9% 29.9% MU
Operating Income 55.59B 352.20M MU
ROE 46.9% -20.1% MU
ROA 35.2% 5.1% MU
Total Assets 134.11B 4.60B MU
Cash 25.00B 524.50M MU
Current Ratio 3.42 1.02 MU
Free Cash Flow 26.10B 326.40M MU

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

MU 1M: -11.5% · 3M: +35.7% VRSK 1M: +2.6% · 3M: +9.8%

Current Technical Phase

MU

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48

RSI (14): 47.8 · Price: $877.57

VRSK

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48

RSI (14): 48.3 · Price: $191.82

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric MU VRSK
Market Cap
Forward P/E 5.7 22.1
Trailing P/E 18.7 29.0
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 3.5% 0.0%
Gross Margin 0.7% 0.7%
Operating Margin 0.8% 0.5%
EPS 44.28 6.55
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, MU is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 10 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.