NODK vs UFCS
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 24, 2026
NODK
UFCS
Investment Advisor Scores
UFCS
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | NODK | UFCS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 0 | 14.1044 | Tie |
| PEG Ratio | 0 | 1.4105 | Tie |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -7.7% | 14.4% | UFCS |
| Earnings Growth | 94.9% | 48.3% | NODK |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 66.3/100 | 44.1/100 | NODK |
| Profit Margin | 2.9% | 9.6% | UFCS |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | STRONG BUY | HOLD | NODK |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
NODK
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 46
UFCS
MarkupPrice above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (5.6% over 20 days), RSI 52
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | NODK | UFCS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.0 | 11.0 |
| Trailing P/E | 40.2 | 9.9 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | -0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| EPS | 0.38 | 5.39 |
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.01% |