QCOM vs TMUS
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jul 29, 2026
QCOM
TMUS
Investment Advisor Scores
TMUS
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | QCOM | TMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 14.8148 | 17.1821 | QCOM |
| PEG Ratio | 0.5272 | 0.7145 | QCOM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -3.5% | 7.9% | TMUS |
| Earnings Growth | 173.0% | 5.3% | QCOM |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 50.3/100 | 50.5/100 | TMUS |
| Profit Margin | 22.3% | 11.5% | QCOM |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
QCOM
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 48
TMUS
DistributionPrice near a flattening SMA50 (slope -2.1%) with fading momentum, RSI 47
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | QCOM | TMUS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.3 | 12.8 |
| Trailing P/E | 18.4 | 18.1 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 8.74 | 9.92 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.02% |