COST vs GFS

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2026

COST

61.0
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

GFS

43.3
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

61score
Recommendation
HOLD

GFS

43score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST GFS Winner
Forward P/E 40 18.7617 GFS
PEG Ratio 4.3883 0.7185 GFS
Revenue Growth 11.6% 5.8% COST
Earnings Growth 15.2% -26.8% COST
Tradestie Score 61.0/100 43.3/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 10.3% GFS
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: -3.8% · 3M: -5.6% GFS 1M: +2.6% · 3M: -45.8%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Markdown
Sell / avoid

Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -1.3%), weak momentum, RSI 38

RSI (14): 37.8 · Price: $898.48

GFS

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 53

RSI (14): 53.1 · Price: $48.57

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST GFS
Market Cap
Forward P/E 39.7 18.5
Trailing P/E 45.0 37.4
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.3%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.1%
EPS 19.88 1.28
Dividend Yield 0.01% 0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.