COST vs LRCX

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Oct 07, 2026

COST

46.7
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

LRCX

44.0
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

47score
Recommendation
HOLD

LRCX

44score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

AI insights temporarily unavailable

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST LRCX Winner
Revenue 207.43B 16.51B COST
Net Income 6.23B 4.99B COST
Net Margin 3.0% 30.2% LRCX
Operating Income 7.88B 5.69B COST
ROE 18.6% 47.1% LRCX
ROA 7.2% 24.0% LRCX
Total Assets 86.43B 20.79B COST
Cash 18.95B 4.75B COST
Current Ratio 1.07 2.54 LRCX

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +3.5% · 3M: +3.2% LRCX 1M: +2.8% · 3M: -6.7%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 61

RSI (14): 61.0 · Price: $942.25

LRCX

Neutral
Hold

Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 56

RSI (14): 56.1 · Price: $329.51

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST LRCX
Market Cap — —
Forward P/E 41.6 40.3
Trailing P/E 44.5 60.1
Revenue (TTM) — —
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.3%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.5%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.4%
EPS 21.03 5.56
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 5 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.