COST vs TGT

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Aug 22, 2026

COST

44.6
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

TGT

37.9
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

45score
Recommendation
HOLD

TGT

38score
Recommendation
EXTENDED

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST TGT Winner
Forward P/E 42.1941 18.6916 TGT
PEG Ratio 4.643 2.8313 TGT
Revenue Growth 21.5% 6.7% COST
Earnings Growth 45.5% -24.7% COST
Tradestie Score 44.6/100 37.9/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 3.2% TGT
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD EXTENDED Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: +2.3% · 3M: -9.8% TGT 1M: +23.0% · 3M: +31.1%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -2.2%) with fading momentum, RSI 49

RSI (14): 48.7 · Price: $947.74

TGT

Markup
Hold / add on dips

Price above SMA50, rising 50-day trend (7.9% over 20 days), RSI 76

RSI (14): 76.1 · Price: $165.44

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST TGT
Market Cap
Forward P/E 41.7 20.7
Trailing P/E 48.1 21.0
Revenue (TTM)
Revenue Growth 0.2% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.3%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.0%
EPS 19.42 7.56
Dividend Yield 0.01% 0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.