COST vs WMT

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Oct 01, 2026

COST

49.9
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

WMT

47.7
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

Oct 01, 2026
50score
Recommendation
HOLD

WMT

Oct 01, 2026
48score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST WMT Winner
Forward P/E 40.3226 38.0228 WMT
PEG Ratio 4.4343 4.2203 WMT
Revenue Growth 11.1% 5.9% COST
Earnings Growth 15.0% -9.1% COST
Tradestie Score 49.9/100 47.7/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 3.0% COST
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
Implied Volatility N/A N/A Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)

COST 1M: -2.7% · 3M: -3.9% WMT 1M: -1.6% · 3M: -6.8%

Current Technical Phase

COST

Distribution
Trim / tighten stop

Price near a flattening SMA50 (slope -1.2%) with fading momentum, RSI 48

RSI (14): 48.5 · Price: $914.94

WMT

Markdown
Sell / avoid

Price below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.1%), weak momentum, RSI 40

RSI (14): 40.0 · Price: $104.26

Fundamentals Snapshot

Metric COST WMT
Market Cap — —
Forward P/E 40.4 35.2
Trailing P/E 43.8 38.8
Revenue (TTM) — —
Revenue Growth 0.1% 0.1%
Gross Margin 0.1% 0.2%
Operating Margin 0.0% 0.0%
EPS 20.80 2.68
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 4 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.