FRT vs SMA
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026
FRT
62.0
AI Score
VS
FRT Wins
SMA
61.4
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | FRT | SMA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 341.08M | 78.31M | FRT |
| Net Income | 159.10M | 9.58M | FRT |
| Net Margin | 46.6% | 12.2% | FRT |
| Operating Income | 208.99M | 16.23M | FRT |
| ROE | 4.8% | 0.8% | FRT |
| ROA | 1.7% | 0.4% | FRT |
| Total Assets | 9.10B | 2.42B | FRT |
| Cash | 115.63M | 38.21M | FRT |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, FRT is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 8 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.