KIM vs STAG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 12, 2026
KIM
STAG
Investment Advisor Scores
STAG
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | KIM | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 28.7356 | 144.9275 | KIM |
| PEG Ratio | 3.3685 | 19.4854 | KIM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 4.9% | 8.1% | STAG |
| Earnings Growth | -5.8% | 3.3% | STAG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 51.2/100 | 49.4/100 | KIM |
| Profit Margin | 27.8% | 28.1% | STAG |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
KIM
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -1.8%), weak momentum, RSI 31
STAG
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 45
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | KIM | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 25.9 | 33.7 |
| Trailing P/E | 27.4 | 28.4 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 0.85 | 1.30 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.04% |