KIM vs STAG
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Nov 12, 2026
KIM
STAG
Investment Advisor Scores
STAG
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | KIM | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 30.4878 | 144.9275 | KIM |
| PEG Ratio | 3.3685 | 19.4854 | KIM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 1.9% | 9.4% | STAG |
| Earnings Growth | 113.7% | 41.0% | KIM |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 34.5/100 | 52.4/100 | STAG |
| Profit Margin | 34.1% | 29.9% | KIM |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | EXTENDED | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
KIM
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 71
STAG
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 53
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | KIM | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 28.9 | 32.6 |
| Trailing P/E | 24.0 | 26.5 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| EPS | 1.07 | 1.41 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 0.04% |