KIM vs UMH
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Oct 02, 2026
KIM
UMH
Investment Advisor Scores
UMH
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | KIM | UMH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 27.4725 | 142.8571 | KIM |
| PEG Ratio | 3.3685 | 0.7224 | UMH |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 4.9% | 7.7% | UMH |
| Earnings Growth | -5.8% | 66.7% | UMH |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 57.3/100 | 55.7/100 | KIM |
| Profit Margin | 27.8% | 11.6% | KIM |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
KIM
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -4.2%), weak momentum, RSI 26
UMH
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 39
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | KIM | UMH |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 25.2 | 99.6 |
| Trailing P/E | 25.8 | 128.3 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| EPS | 0.86 | 0.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.05% | 0.06% |