MSFT vs AAPL
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Aug 06, 2026
MSFT
54.1
AI Score
VS
MSFT Wins
AAPL
53.2
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AAPL
53score
Recommendation
HOLD
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MSFT | AAPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 364.36B | 241.83B | AAPL |
| Net Income | 101.46B | 97.98B | AAPL |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 68.2% | MSFT |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | 40.5% | MSFT |
| Operating Income | 122.43B | 114.63B | AAPL |
| ROE | 94.4% | 23.6% | AAPL |
| ROA | 26.5% | 14.1% | AAPL |
| Total Assets | 383.27B | 694.23B | MSFT |
| Cash | 39.54B | 32.10B | AAPL |
| Debt/Equity | 0.77 | 0.10 | MSFT |
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.28 | MSFT |
| Free Cash Flow | 110.20B | 47.35B | AAPL |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
MSFT 1M: +30.1%
· 3M: +20.5%
AAPL 1M: -0.3%
· 3M: +8.7%
Current Technical Phase
MSFT
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 78
AAPL
NeutralHold
Mixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 47
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | MSFT | AAPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 25.2 | 32.4 |
| Trailing P/E | 25.9 | 34.8 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 17.94 | 8.88 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, MSFT is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 5 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.