QCOM vs CSCO
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 02, 2026
QCOM
CSCO
Investment Advisor Scores
CSCO
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | QCOM | CSCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 16.1551 | 20.8768 | QCOM |
| PEG Ratio | 0.7248 | 1.0339 | QCOM |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | -4.0% | 17.6% | CSCO |
| Earnings Growth | -23.0% | 52.0% | CSCO |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 57.1/100 | 59.7/100 | CSCO |
| Profit Margin | 21.0% | 20.9% | QCOM |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
QCOM
NeutralMixed signals - no dominant trend phase, RSI 53
CSCO
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.6%), weak momentum, RSI 40
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | QCOM | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 16.3 | 22.9 |
| Trailing P/E | 18.8 | 33.0 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Gross Margin | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| EPS | 9.09 | 3.35 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 0.02% |