CFG vs MTB
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Sep 23, 2026
CFG
MTB
Investment Advisor Scores
MTB
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CFG | MTB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 10.3093 | 10.8108 | CFG |
| PEG Ratio | 1.6472 | 1.3864 | MTB |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 14.7% | 6.2% | CFG |
| Earnings Growth | 41.3% | 25.5% | CFG |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 65.8/100 | 57.9/100 | CFG |
| Profit Margin | 26.1% | 32.1% | MTB |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |
Relative Price Performance (Last 90 Days)
Current Technical Phase
CFG
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.1%), weak momentum, RSI 30
MTB
MarkdownPrice below a falling SMA50 (slope -2.2%), weak momentum, RSI 27
Fundamentals Snapshot
| Metric | CFG | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.8 | 10.3 |
| Trailing P/E | 13.9 | 11.5 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | — |
| Revenue Growth | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| EPS | 4.58 | 18.91 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |